The Irony of Making MailPro All-Digital

A recent decision by the Postal Service to transition its MailPro magazine to an all-digital format has left many in the mailing community scratching our heads. This bi-monthly newsletter is full of valuable information for readers who depend on the mail. Each issue includes news on USPS programs and services, pricing information, mailing success stories and industry trends.

Personally, I very much value the hard copy edition I receive in my mailbox. I travel often for business and almost always take a recent copy with me to read on the plane. The news that MailPro is moving to an all-digital format was personally disappointing and sends the wrong message to the mailing community.

At a time when the entire industry, including the Postal Service, is focused on educating businesses on the strong ROI of physical mail and the need to include print communication in cross-channel campaigns, it’s frustrating that the USPS has decided to stop mailing its own publication.

In the message to readers, it states, “While we’re saying goodbye to the old MailPro and hello to the new MailProDigital.com, our goal remains the same: providing you — our customers — from the largest high-volume shippers to small businesses to e-commerce sellers, the information you need to grow your business through the mail.” The irony here is almost too much to take.

There were a few sound options the USPS should have considered before halting the print edition. They could have surveyed readers and continued to mail to those who prefer the print version – much like marketers do with their loyalty programs. Like a few others in the industry have mentioned, they should have explored options to reduce mailing costs. Using a Slim Jim or Stretch format to qualify for Standard Mail letter rates seems like an obvious solution. The American Catalog Mailers Association (ACMA) mentioned a similar option for retailers to help offset the rising fees for mailing full size catalogs.

Regardless of their intent, the Postal Service did a poor job of optimizing the print technology and postal optimization opportunities available to them. These are the same issues our industry is confronted with every day. The USPS had a perfect opportunity to set an example for the industry and showcase how to deal with pricing pressures. This time, they didn’t deliver.

Blog Author

Debora Haskel
Vice President of Marketing. Graduate of Syracuse University. Bringing the “there’s no such thing as good enough” philosophy to IWCO Direct since 2000. Single Source Award winner while at Banta, antique auction aficionado and New York Yankees supporter since age 4.

View More Posts by Debora

All the Best Tips. All in One Place.

Complimentary Offer

Concept to Conversion – A Master Collection of Direct Mail Tips from SpeakingDIRECT
Get instant access to our compilation of the best direct mail tips and trends from nearly 300 blogs and unlock better overall direct mail performance and ROI.

Sign Me Up!

2 Responses

  1. Lorne Hood says:

    Debora, Thank you for bringing this up. I hope the Postal Service will read your message and understand the setback and confusion this has caused. Don’t we continually talk about choice for the consumer what channel or combinations of work best and are valued by the user? And certainly changing the format was doable. Between format change and choice, I would have to think budget concerns would have been addressed.

    This is truly frustrating.

    • Debora Haskel says:

      Lorne –
      Thanks so much for your comments. Our mutual frustration is shared by many. We plan to engage our senior level contacts at the USPS on this topic and will keep you posted on their response.

Speak Your Mind